Re: HD or not HD? That is the ?


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ chicagomedia.org :: Chicago Radio, TV, All Media Discussion Forum ]

Posted by hm on April 06, 2011 at 10:47:38:

In Reply to: HD or not HD? That is the ? posted by Mr. Kenneth Noisewater on April 06, 2011 at 05:07:39:

Does anyone have speculation as to why there might be such a varying effect? For example you mentioned 103.5 and 105.9 being worse. Both of those stations have some sister stations that transmit from the same location but you get a better HD signal from those?


: This is for those with an HD Radio. No anti HD comments please, just reality.

: In Chicago, what FM HD signals in your area are best and which ones are worse. This goes for all areas. This is in regards to reception and drops.

: For example, in Kenosha

: Best
: 97.9
: 99.5
: 100.3
: 101.1
: 104.3
: 106.7

: In between:
: 90.1
: 91.5
: 93.1
: 98.7
: 101.9
: 102.7
: 107.5

: Almost non existent:
: 93.9
: 95.5
: 96.3
: 103.5
: 105.9

: Non existent
: 92.3
: 94.7

: I think signal and stability wise 103.5 and 105.9 are among the worse. I got a large number of drops on both of these even in downtown Chicago.




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:



Enter verification code:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ chicagomedia.org :: Chicago Radio, TV, All Media Discussion Forum ]


postings are the opinions of their respective posters and site ownership disclaims any responsibility for the content contained.
(register a domain name, host your web site, accept credit cards)